Printer Friendly Version
Email this thread to a friend
|
Youtube Results on Google (In: Google)
all the results in 1 page (In: SEO Tools and Software Utilities)
Featured Web Site Template |
|
There are 0 guests and 1 members in the forums right now.
Reflects user activity within the last 5 minutes
|
|
| Member |
Message |
tjefferson
Joined: Nov 01, 2006
# Posts: 5
|
Posted: 2006-Nov-01 14:01
Hi,
I observed a site which is having PR 4, indexed in all the major search engines and having good back links. But, recently in Google, the total pages gone into supplemental results. It is a site launched in 2004. From the same server, 10 more sites are launched. But they all are in general index. What is reason behind placing links into "Supplemental". If anyone of you are having any answers, reply me.
Thanks in Advance..
|
 |
Logan
Joined: Aug 14, 2002
# Posts: 3749
|
Posted: 2006-Nov-01 21:27
It is a site launched in 2004. From the same server, 10 more sites are launched. But they all are in general index.
Do these site's have links between each other?
|
|
Hampstead
Joined: Feb 20, 2001
# Posts: 2015
|
Posted: 2006-Nov-02 16:57
Are the URLs canonical?
Are there multiple URLs?
Do you have different title and metas for each page?
Are you using JavaScript redirect?
Is there any hidden text?
Does each page have at leaset 85% unique content?
Have you bought inbound links?
|
|
tjefferson
Joined: Nov 01, 2006
# Posts: 5
|
Posted: 2006-Nov-03 14:00
Hi Logan,
No, the sites are not linked to each other. They are independent.
Hi Hampstead, these are points for your questions. please check them and suggest me.
1. Redirected non www version to www version.
2. No multiple URL's.
3. Yes, the titles and description are unique.
4. No Java script redirections.
5. No hidden text in any page.
6. No, content similarity is about 40%.
7. No, I did normal link building for the site.
Thanks both of you for your responses.
|
|
Hampstead
Joined: Feb 20, 2001
# Posts: 2015
|
Posted: 2006-Nov-03 16:28
Item 6 could well be your problem.
It was suggested by Matt Cutts (Google) that 85% is the desired minimum unique content.
|
|
g1smd
Staff
Joined: Jul 28, 2002
# Posts: 10438
|
Posted: 2006-Nov-03 16:34
Similarity 40% would make for 60% not duplicate. 
|
|
You are not permitted to post messages in this forum or topic, because of one or more of the following reasons:
- You have not yet logged in, or registered properly as a member
- You are a member, but no longer have posting rights.
- This is a private forum, for which you do not have permissions.
If you are a recent member, it's possible that you simply have not yet confirmed your account. Please
check your email for a message entitled 'JimWorld Forums: Confirm Your Account' and follow the instructions
contained within.
If you cannot find this message, click here to Re-Send it.
|
If you are still experiencing problem, please read the
Login Assistance
Article for some advice on what may be causing your login not to work properly.
|
Switch to Advanced Editor and ...
Create a New Topic
or Reply to this Thread
|
|
Inbox
